Jonah Goldberg in his column about the
Kavanaugh senate hearings concludes as follows:
“Sasse eloquently expanded on a point I’ve been banging my spoon
on my highchair about for a while now: The legislative branch is becoming a
parliament of pundits, in which both parties teem with people desperate to
emote, preen, and shriek for voters and donors who follow politics like it’s a
form of entertainment.”
This or something like it has been
increasingly noticed and remarked upon. The use of the word “parliament” is
also significant carrying as it does the implication that the demarcation
between the legislative and executive branch has been broken.
But what I haven’t seen is much
attention to the question of why. The explanation that people in congress are
happy to have the title without the responsibility is, I think, only partially
correct and may also have cause and effect backwards. That is, a congress with
little responsibility may now be attracting applicants who like that sort of
thing.
If I may offer a theory as to why, I
think we are seeing the institutional effects of what the philosopher Michael
Oakeshott categorized as the politics of enterprise association. Think of a
business and you’ve basically got what enterprise association is about.
Oakeshott theorized that enterprise association turned governing into a
managerial activity and thought a nation in war time (no doubt thinking of WWI
and WWII) was when its pure form was most closely realized.
Now consider how a business is run. It
is far more akin to the executive branch model than the congressional. The more
historically inclined may correct me, but my sense is that in war time congress
tends to take a back seat in affairs. The action shifts to the executive and
the various administrative agencies.
My answer to my question then is that
congress has become a somewhat vacuous collection of pundits because our
politics have become enterprise association dominant. Congressional prerogative
has been ceded to the executive and administrative agencies, not by accident or
a desire to escape responsibility, so much as by form following function. Or to
be clearer, the form of our government has shifted to coincide with a change in
function. And by implication I would suggest that banging spoons on highchairs
will come to nothing so long as the fundamental nature of our politics, what
the people demand government be, remains unchanged.
Link to the article: https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/kavanaugh-confirmation-hearings-cory-booker-document-release/
Link to the article: https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/kavanaugh-confirmation-hearings-cory-booker-document-release/