In the discussion of Muslim immigration and accepting
refugees there has been a great deal of focus on secondary issues and little
attention on the main one. If citizens were confident that the government could
distinguish between Muslims that were coming here to embrace America and
Muslims who remain committed to sharia law and are either already radicalized
or pre-disposed to radicalism we wouldn’t be having this debate.
At National Review today Andrew McCarthy argues that the “they’ll
lie” critique of the (rather silly in my view) Trump proposal is “meritless”.
He points out that the burden of proof is on the immigrant and that it is a felony punishable by five years’
imprisonment to lie on government forms or to government agents conducting a
legitimate investigation.” But of course it is the state that has the burden of
proof in criminal cases to prove guilt, and yet somehow, someway we regularly
read stories about people being released from prison because it later turns out
they were innocent. The reticence of some/many to accept Syrian refugees in
large numbers has been described as bigotry and un-American and is loudly
supported by the President. In which direction do you think government
officials will be inclined to tilt the scales in evaluating applications?
Today on Twitter
Stephen Hayes of the Weekly Standard posted that the “terrorist sent 109
encrypted messages to overseas jihadist morning of Garland attack.” The FBI
failed to pick up on this. Still think doubts about immigrant vetting are
groundless?
In the movie
Casino, the mobsters from Kansas City are in court and during a break they get
into a discussion of what to do about potential witnesses:
Vinny Forlano: He
won't talk. Stone is a good kid. Stand-up guy, just like his old man. That's
the way I see it.
Vincent Borelli: I agree. He's solid. A fuckin' Marine.
Capelli: He's okay. He always was. Remo, what do you think?
Remo Gaggi: Look... why take a
chance? At least, that's the way I feel about it.
Sadly, the government has given us plenty of reason to feel like Remo Gaggi. Given the stakes we’re not inclined to be Flounder and be told at a not too distant date by some government Otter that “you fucked up….you trusted us.” The issue is the screening, stupid.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/428244/its-impractical-because-theyll-lie-objection-trumps-proposal-meritless-andrew-c
No comments:
Post a Comment