We still haven’t gotten to the point of an actual primary so one should be a little cautious about making pronouncements, but as things stand right now we are looking at a candidate—Mitt Romney--who is not liked or trusted by conservatives cruising to the nomination of the party supposedly dominated by those self same conservatives. How does someone who can’t crack 25% establish himself as Mr. Inevitable? Easy, when none of the conservative candidates are credible.
In no particular order, what I believe conservatives would like to see in a challenger to Romney and aren’t is:
a) An articulate and solid debater who can make the case for himself and conservative policies with fluency. [out Perry, Cain]
b) Someone with solid, unquestioned allegiance to conservative principles without being an unbending ideologue. [out Bachman, Paul]
c) A candidate who is well versed in domestic and foreign policy matters. [out Perry, Cain, Bachman]
d) A happy warrior, someone with an appealing personality while running for office [out everyone but Cain]
No comments:
Post a Comment